Global Motoring News
BY CRAIG TRUDELL, TARA PATEL AND GABRIELLE COPPOLA
Jeep’s China failure sends warning signal to global carmakers as it begs unsettling questions about what the future holds for foreign manufacturers in China.
Visit CRA’s blog page for more relevant articles.
It was one of the first international car brands to enter China, widely recognised by consumers and understood by its owners to have huge potential.
The announcement this week that Stellantis plans to terminate its local joint venture with state-owned Guangzhou Automobile Group was the culmination of a seemingly can’t-miss wager gone awry. It begs unsettling questions about what the future holds for foreign manufacturers in China.
The government set out 40 years ago or so to develop the nation’s motor industry by pairing local companies with experienced international players, among the earliest of which was former Jeep owner American Motors. These proverbial training wheels are not only no longer needed, but out of step with President Xi Jinping’s desire for China to become more self-reliant. The golden age of brisk growth and abundant profits for these joint ventures appears to be over.
“We’re at the beginning of the end of the JV era in China,” said Michael Dunne, CEO of ZoZo Go, a consultancy that advises companies how to navigate the nation’s motor industry.
“It’s still the biggest market and nobody wants to get out, but you start to look around and say, ‘Why am I in this marriage?’”
Stellantis’s union with Guangzhou Auto is a few months removed from an openly testy moment. While Bloomberg News had reported in September that Stellantis had wanted to raise its ownership stake in the 50-50 venture, the carmaker known as GAC Group claimed to be caught off guard when its partner made this plan public in January. Less than six months later, Stellantis has opted for a divorce, citing a lack of progress toward increasing its shareholding to 75%.
CEO Carlos Tavares isn’t ready to completely abandon China. The 63-year-old Portuguese and paragon of cost discipline has alluded to an “asset-light” business model for the company formed last year from the merger between PSA Group and Fiat Chrysler. He may be able to profitably ship electrified Jeeps into the market, but no carmaker is pursuing such a strategy at high volume. Import duties aren’t as inhibitive as they used to be, but at 15% keep overseas brands from pricing their wares close to increasingly competitive domestic companies.
Tavares’ ambitions aren’t the issue. The 2030 strategic plan he shared on March 1 called for Stellantis to launch roughly 30 products and approach €2bn (roughly R20,486,100,000) annual revenue in China. That’s an awfully high hope considering the company sold 122,000 vehicles there last year, enough for only 0.6% market share.
Just 22 days after Tavares delivered that address, he witnessed the disastrous consequences of being “asset-heavy” in a country that’s become a geopolitical pariah. PSA’s long-time French rival Renault caved to pressure from Ukraine and its allies to stop operating a Moscow plant and reconsider its position as majority owner of Lada-making venture AvtoVaz. Renault later agreed to transfer its €2.2bn (roughly R2,253,471,000) Russian business to state entities for the token sum of one ruble.
Jeep knows full well what a nightmare it can be when politics and car production mix. A decade ago, then-boss of the brand Mike Manley, who went on to be Fiat Chrysler’s CEO, said Jeep would consider localising every one of its models in China. Conservative media outlets and 2012 US Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney distorted those comments to suggest Jeep was going to uproot from the key battleground states of Ohio, Michigan and Illinois, and move its manufacturing to one of America’s nemeses. PolitiFact later named this their annual Lie of the Year.
If Tavares follows through with terminating the Jeep venture with GAC Group, he’ll be left only with a JV with Dongfeng Motor that similarly never took off as PSA had hoped. The future of that business also looks uncertain, with the two having recently agreed to a framework for Dongfeng to sell off what’s left of its shareholding in Stellantis, which has shrunk to less than 3.2%.
International carmakers that have fared much better than Stellantis in China, including Volkswagen and General Motors, also are having a tough time preserving their position. Dunne believes the two are “the powerhouses of yesterday”.
“You can feel the momentum has shifted in favor of Chinese brands,” Dunne said.
“The government is talking about self-sufficiency, nationalism, depend on ourselves. Chinese consumers say ‘I can get a pretty good car from Chinese brands.’”
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Main Image: The golden era of brisk growth and abundant profits for international companies and their local joint venture partners is over. Image: Bloomberg
Read Also: New Driving Rules Proposed For South Africa
Article Credit To BusinessTech Motoring.
What is your view of Jeep’s failure in China? Let us know in the comments below. Also, if you found our content informative, do like it and share it with your friends.
Read Also: How To Check If You Have Outstanding Traffic Fines
Join the CRA Mailing List, It’s FREE
Click here to join the CRA mailing list, the innovative and trusted source for relevant motoring information and the latest news.