CRA Technology & Safety Explored

AEB systems are ineffective at a night study showed, that was conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).


Visit CRA’s industry news blog page for more relevant articles.


The study found that AEB systems practically made no difference in pedestrian crashes that occurred at night, Teslarati reported.

The study found that pedestrian crash rates of all severities were 27 percent lower when vehicles were equipped with AEB systems. Injury crash rates were 30 percent lower. However, the study also found that AEB systems made no difference in tests conducted in “unlighted areas.”



“This is the first real-world study of pedestrian AEB to cover a broad range of manufacturers, and it proves the technology is eliminating crashes,” says Jessica Cicchino, IIHS vice president of research. “Unfortunately, it also shows these systems are much less effective in the dark, where three-quarters of fatal pedestrian crashes happen.”

Volkswagen’s Taos model was the only vehicle that didn’t see its AEB performance decline in nighttime conditions. The Taos received essentially the same nighttime tests scores compared to daytime evaluations. However, the IIHS noted that the Taos was also the worst performer during the daytime tests.



Article Credit to FenderBender.


What is your view of AEB systems that are not so effective at night to prevent pedestrian accidents? As three-quarters of pedestrian accidents take place at night, is it really worth it to have a AEB system? Let us know in the comments below. Also, if you found our content informative, do like it and share it with your friends.



Click HERE to join the CRA Industry Newsletter, it’s FREE

CRA is the innovative and trusted source for motoring information and the latest news to help entrepreneurs, business owners, managers and people working in the motor industry to stay informed and change their world. Get the advice your need to start, glow, and lead your business today. Get unlimited access to all articles.